1/6/2024 0 Comments Diptrace import eagle libraryFor what you are trying to do I would choose to export multiple libraries. In 9.1.1 the procedure is as follows:įrom there you will see a window like the following:įrom here you can select whether to export to multiple libraries (this maintains the libraries as described in the board) or to create one combined library for the parts in the board. I'm not sure what version of EAGLE you are using but it looks like Pedro is using an older version as the export tool has changed quite a bit compared to the version in his example. I haven't used Altium or Orcad, maybe they do a better job at this stuff.As Pedro states, you can export the libraries used in a design very easily. The netlist design process is klunky and hard to work with, and you'll find yourself jumping through hoops all the time just to go back and forth between the schematic and layout. ![]() I do wish there were better library management tools. There are other substitutions you can use as well. It will also automatically label the value if you have a text label containing >VALUE. The label for a part is automatically placed, as long as the Device and Footprint have text labels containing >NAME. It sounds more complicated than it is, and once you get the process into your muscle memory you'll find it works really well. If there's more than one thing to move near what you clicked, right click until the thing you want is selected, then left click, move it, and left click to place. Moving stuff is pretty easy, just type "mov" and then click on what you want to move. With a little bit of practice you can navigate EAGLE pretty quickly using a combination of commands and the mouse. It's actually really handy to just type "add gnd" and click to place a GND. I almost never use the icons on the left, instead I just type in what I need. My feelings can be summed up like this: EAGLE is the worst EDA package, except for all the others. I tried to start on KiCAD and the moment I saw the 10 step procedure (1 step in Linux but I'm in windows) for importing a part I said NEXT! So.is KiCAD, Altium, or Orcad any better. But the user interface seems to be intentionally made to waste as much time as possible - time which costs at least $38 an hour (the rate of an experienced layout engineer). Why do I have to manually place the label for the part (why isn't it already there)? Why don't the pins and package auto-link? Why are you forced to type "use *" at the eagle commandline every time you add a library? Why is there no tool that will let you just search all open libraries everywhere in a big database for your part and download it and give you the ability to place the part? Why not expose all that garbage when you need it, instead of all the time. I get some complex parts might have 52 layers. And don't even get me started on how the most basic footprint has 52 layers in the design. You can't just rightclick if you want to change something - better find the change tool. You can't just click what you want to move - you have to squint your eyes and find the move tool. ![]() I noticed this ridiculous amount of duplicate steps. The reason is that there were some mistakes in my design as a result of using that EDA program, and it ran kind of sluggishly, so I figured I'd switch. Well, I decided to recreate a schematic made in "Easy EDA" in Eagle. And I've used many, many tools on a computer, from the horrid (Xilinx FPGA tools) to pretty decent stuff (PIC C compiler).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |